Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bageshwari (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Bageshwari (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article PRODded with reason: "Relatively new magazine. No independent reliable sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. Article creation too soon." Article dePRODded by anonymous IP without reason stated. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Publications-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non notable magazine. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent in-depth coverage that I can find. Not my native language though. DMacks (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as too soon, not yet convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.