Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagong Bayan, San Pablo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to San Pablo, Laguna. Hog Farm Talk 14:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Bagong Bayan, San Pablo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This and all other barangay articles of the village-level divisions of the city of San Pablo, Laguna listed below fail WP:GEOLAND. Majority of them function like WP:DIRECTORY and some are unsourced. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)  09:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)  09:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Other barangays:
 * Concepcion, San Pablo


 * '''Del Remedio, San Pablo


 * '''San Diego, San Pablo


 * '''San Francisco, San Pablo


 * '''San Isidro, San Pablo


 * San Jose, San Pablo, Laguna


 * San Lorenzo, San Pablo


 * San Lucas 1, San Pablo


 * San Lucas 2, San Pablo


 * San Mateo, San Pablo


 * Santa Isabel, San Pablo


 * Santo Angel, San Pablo


 * VI-D, San Pablo


 * VII-B, San Pablo


 * VII-D, San Pablo

List added by — JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

See also majority of the results at Tambayan Philippines/Frequent discussions/Articles on barangays. If not deleted, then redirected. If someone will !vote for merge, then there should be a decent and good table under San Pablo, Laguna (which it does not have as of this writing). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect All to San Pablo, Laguna per WP:CHEAP. There's no article to be written about any of these and they are adequately covered at the higher level. FOARP (talk) 14:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect all These are better to summarize in the main article. Reywas92Talk 21:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.