Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagpipes from Baghdad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Relapse (album). v/r - TP 03:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Bagpipes from Baghdad

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NSONGS, not much coverage in media and does not pass WP:GNG. I am proposing that this article be redirected to Relapse (album).  Eagles   24/7  (C)  04:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Relapse (album) per nom. It's a somewhat controversial song, but not quite enough to justify having its own article.  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 08:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 08:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 04:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

--GH200 (talk) 06:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)  I think it should stay. Cause it was very contraversal and is a pretty popular song among Eminem fans and people who don't like Miriah Carey. He has a song called The Warning that has a wiki page and it is kind of like a second part to this one so it would make no since to have The Warning and not this one. Don't delete the other page either. We would not be doing our job if we deleted this page or either one. Instead we should improve both pages.--GH200 (talk) 06:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect - per nom. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  11:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I have no problem with this staying if it is expanded more (especially the controversy). As it stands now, it neither passes WP:NSONGS nor WP:GNG. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 06:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom and WP:NMUSIC.  HurricaneFan 25  01:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.