Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahamas International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Bahamas International

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable tennis competition. It only ran once, with only one game - seems more like an exhibition match than anything else. Cannot find any sources other than news reports at the time. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete. Agree. Same with Ferrara. Not notable. — WylieCoyote (talk) 03:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC) I do agree that this event was hardly as significant as other major tennis events, but it was part of the Grand Prix tennis circuit and is counted on the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) web site, which I included as a source when creating this article. Additionally, I created this article as part of the effort of fulfilling one of the goals of WikiProject Tennis, which is to "Create articles for every tennis tournament for male and female players, especially since the beginning of the Open Era, including yearly articles and draws." For these reasons, I feel that this article should be maintained. User:Alexk785 (talk) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. Per WikiProject Tennis as cited by Alexk785. Cloudz 679 21:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.