Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahamas Petroleum Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Bahamas Petroleum Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

General Notability Guideline not met by this company. I have been able to prove that this company exists, that this company is publicly traded and that they hold a licence to explore off-shore - and that's all. It's just a routine company going about its routine business. Nothing I have found proves notability. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep a simple google search showed me that the company does exist and is in fact publicly traded: https://www.google.com.ar/search?q=%22Bahamas+Petroleum+Company%22&oq=%22Bahamas+Petroleum+Company%22&aqs=chrome..69i57l2j69i59l3.2622j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 It's important to distinguish "importance or significance" from "notability": A7 does not require that an article indicates that the subject meets a notability guideline, merely suggest that the article could be improved to a state where it does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpkersbergen123 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You clearly didn't read my rationale properly. Read it again - and then tell me why you're talking about WP:A7 when it doesn't apply at Articles for Deletion discussions. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- nothing stands out about this company; the coverage is routine, not rising to the level of WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH as there is nothing notable about this. --  Dane talk  01:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.