Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahra Biscuit Factory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 12:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Bahra Biscuit Factory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising The Banner talk 21:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be a legitimate Foodstuff Production Company and has a place here along with already established article such as United Biscuits or Fox's Biscuits. Under all our guidelines and essays regarding these subjects, I see no grounds for deletion. Any POV issues are stylistic and editorial and largely surmountable problems.Chronopher (talk) 19:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The article is not POV, it is an advertisement. And comparing with other articles is useless, as all articles are judged on their own merit. The Banner talk 21:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Although I have to admit that those articles do not have Russian text in the article.
 * Keep but changes needed as a reference to this biscuit manufacture but needs a lot of editing to meet guidelines and the remove the spam! will be needed.Kolforn (talk) 14:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  14:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I have made a start on making this article acceptable, but it still need further work. Lets leave it up and running and see how it develops. Kolforn  ♣  18:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.