Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahrain 10–0 Indonesia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Bahrain 10–0 Indonesia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The page is about a normal result between two national teams. The page isn't needed in the encyclopedia. In 2009, Poland beat San Marino 10-0 and in 2011, Jordan beat Nepal 9-0. --Uishaki (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think we should keep this article. The controversial match has certainly attracted some attention that the others you mention did not. U+003F? 16:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable.--Uishaki (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You don't need to !vote, it's clear that you're in favour of deletion since you personally nominated it. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, as notable as any other "single" match given the global coverage. Concerns over match-rigging, the massive score etc all lend weight to an article and then add the references from Reuters, the Daily Telegraph, (and a quick Google search say it was covered by the Guardian, Al Jazeera, etc) and you have an article worth keeping. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Not only is it a notable result, and one which actually instigated a review/investigation by FIFA, it has a place in football history alongside Australia 31–0 American Samoa, for which an article has existed for some time. doktorb wordsdeeds 19:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a controversial match which is under FIFA investigation. This match have unusual result (FIFA ranking margin of both teams is not far enough, record before this match is in balanced, Indonesia win 2 times, draw 2 times, Bahrain win 2 times). Internal conflict in The Football Association of Indonesia lead them to prevent all Indonesia Super League players from playing. They only sent players who play in Indonesia Premier League. Although many or "nearly all" of Indonesian fans understand that regular, better, and experienced national players play in Indonesia Super League. So, it means they only sent young and unexperienced player. They dont sent best team, it can break down spirit of the game, to respect each other.&#42;Annas* (talk) 06:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - these seems to be just about enough converage to warrant an article. GiantSnowman 12:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems entirely notable. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Certainly notable, got significant media coverage & not just for the result. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - received significant coverage. Not necessarily for the result but the circumstances surrounding it. Edinburgh  Wanderer  20:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - looks to be anything but a "normal result"! Hence all the coverage. Clavdia chauchat (talk) 10:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - .. given the circumstances and the ensuing FIFA investigation into the result, it's not about the 10-0 scoreline mentioned in the nom. TonyStarks (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - easily passes WP:GNG due to amount of coverage by reliable independent sources. – Kosm  1  fent  10:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.