Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahraini Hezbollah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Bahraini Hezbollah

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I believe this article should be deleted because it displays no source and no evidence (from the internet) even suggests that this group "Bahraini Hezbollah" even exists. I have not found any legitimate source on the internet pertaining to this group (aside from those linking back to this article). It is likely a fictional group and for such reasons, I nominate it for deletion. Droodkin (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. Difficult one to call. There are lots of news articles about militant government opposition which has been labelled as Hezbollah. There are also many claims that it is sponsored from Iran. It could be propaganda but there might be some truth in it. Which leads me to think that any article is likely to be WP:OR.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 17:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - unnecessary content fork about an organisation which may well not exist. If it does exist, it should be covered in a relevant article about Islamism in Bahrain or the Politics of Bahrain - I can't see any evidence that it's notable (no significant coverage). --Anthem 19:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note Anthem of joy has been indef blocked as a sockpuppet of Claritas . --Tothwolf (talk) 04:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 20:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Will it be deleted ? Droodkin (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources and after seven years is no more than a one sentence article. --Ted87 (talk) 00:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.