Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahram Gurbanov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Bahram Gurbanov

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Technical nomination. This article was PRODed by anon editor, but after that was DEPRODed by potentially COI editor. Reason for PROD was lack of reliable sources. Beagel (talk) 07:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)



I don`t understand one moment. I gave a number of references and external links,so..why article has to be deleted ? Fuadenbaum
 * Please do not remove the AfD tag before the discussion is closed. For sources, please see WP:RS, which sources are satisfying reliable sources criteria. Also, most of information you re-added to the article qualifies as corporate spam and should be removed. Removing this, there is no sources about Bahram Gurbanov. Beagel (talk) 09:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for information. How can I prove that all information in article are true ? because I have not a lot of reliable sources. --Fuadenbaum —Preceding undated comment added 09:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. All references given in the article are affiliated with the subject and his enterprise and the 1newz statement is about the GRBS centre, not explicitely about Gurbanov. No independent proof of notability. De728631 (talk) 13:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent reliable sources for notability. --Muhandes (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You are missing the point. The first question would be is this person notable enough to be included in Wikipedia? Did the person receive significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the person? If the answer is that you do not have enough reliable independent secondary sources, the person is not notable per the relevant guideline, and should be removed. And if you keep removing the AfD notice from the page despite repeating warnings, you will be blocked. --Muhandes (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete The article seems to be written/maintained by a copywriter. No reliable sources, all references listed seem to be not about the subject but about something else (with claimed connection to the subject). Not notable per WP policies. 208.123.163.171 (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.