Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahram Resul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Bahram Resul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I failed to find in-depth coverage so we can write without WP:OR. If the invention is notable then we should have an article on the invention which we have but not on him. Fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  16:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete nothing even close to meeting notability criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing to indicate notability under WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. Article was written by a now-blocked user with a history of poor quality contributions on Kurdish-related topics. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.