Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahri Tufina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Bahri Tufina

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBIO. Note that the current sources in the article mention other members of the Tufina family, but not Bahri himself. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 22:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The article does not lack in coverage. With the current information that is available and trusted, I have created this document. To say it lacks in depth coverage you should be more specific as to what aspect it does and not only throw words. With more information coming to light, this page might be updated and the extra information can be added.
 * Family members are only mentioned to reinforce Bahri Tufina connection to his family and watchemaking in general. Also they are mentioned because Bahri Tufina has worked with them as partners or have had them as mentors. MuhamedK10 (talk) 08:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Three out of the four cited sources never mentioned the subject, and the one that did only mentioned him in passing. Found no significant coverage to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as explained above, sourcing not mentioning the subject, rest of the sources are of poor quality. Oaktree b (talk) 02:14, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * ZERO hits in Gnews or Gnewspapers. I would have expected someone as well-known as the article claims to have some sort of coverage when they passed away, there isn't. Oaktree b (talk) 02:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.