Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bailey and Southside


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  Hut 8.5  18:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Bailey and Southside

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Completely unsourced article, with some advertorial overtones, about a single-station radio program in a single media market. WP:NMEDIA does not grant a presumption of notability on a radio show until it airs on a network of stations approaching national coverage, but WP:GNG has not been met either as the closest thing to referencing here is the program's own primary source website about itself. Bearcat (talk) 06:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  07:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. over-detailed promotionalism. Should have been removed long ago.  DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO with a good dose of WP:TNT; an unreferenced essay and badly promotional. No indications of notability or significance and borders on spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.