Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bainbridge Northern Railway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, bad faith nom. JYolkowski // talk 22:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Bainbridge Northern Railway
This railway is completely non-notable and has no references! House Centipede 04:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and let grow. Historic rail companies/lines are notable. Added TrainsWikiProject stamp to talk page. --Marriedtofilm 16:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a stub and stubs are short by nature.  WP:TWP is working toward building the most comprehensive coverage of rail transport possible, and this will include quite a number of minor lines that have existed in the past. Slambo (Speak)  19:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Looking at the nominator's contributions, I see a lot of edits that would be considered vandalism and that have been reverted as such. Slambo (Speak) 19:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.