Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bains Sharif


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Bains Sharif

 * – ( View AfD View log

Non-notable village. I have performed a search and found things that seem to affirm that it’s a real place that exists (e.g. weather reports) but nothing substantial. I am also nominating the following related page because it is about the same place and is therefore equally non-notable:
 * Bains (Mirpur)

postleft on mobile!  03:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Relisting comment: Article was nominated in December, but for some reason (possibly a script misfire) it was never transcluded onto the daily logpage, never !voted on, and never closed (although the article bore an AfD notice the entire time). This makes it quite possibly the longest-running AfD in Wikipedia history -- I'm relisting it now so that people other than me and the nominator can see it. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 03:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Per nominator; the article has no citations (and content indicating original research), and a search failed to turn up any sources whatsoever. Does not seem like a subject for which sources could be found. jp×g 03:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Village in Pakistan has fields and sufi shrines. Woopdedoo. Not notable, fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The other article in this nomination was never tagged. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 14:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete both, now that there are two articles in the nom, per my above comment (only reference for the second one is a Scribd document, which is essentially a random unverified PDF). jp×g 19:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.