Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bait dog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 01:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

bait dog
Originally tagged for ; however, Kappa thinks it is more notable than it appears. There is only one reference here. That reference still makes this look like neologism. Further this article could never be more than the dictdef it currently is. At a minimum it should be sent to Wiktionary and let them decide what to do with it. James084 18:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, can be expanded to cover legal and medical issues. Possible merge with dog fighting. Also there seems to be a different type of "bait dog" Kappa 18:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef -- Ruby  22:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless expanded. Agree with Kappa that there's potential for expansion but it's come to AfD now and can always be recreated later.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  23:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a legitimate stub. It was only created a couple of days ago, let it sit with the expert tag on it for a while and allow natural growth. Turnstep 01:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep National Geographic sees it as a legitimate term. D e nni &#9775;  02:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.