Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajo las riendas del amor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Bajo las riendas del amor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't find the reliable sources to back up that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. It has been tagged for notability for 7 years. It has articles in several other languages, so there may be something I'm missing. Boleyn (talk) 07:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Unfortunately the original official site at esmas.com has disappeared. The DVD link at Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/Bajo-Las-Riendas-Del-Amor/dp/B007RMQ4YA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1427640394&sr=8-1&keywords=bajo+las+riendas+del+amor - is all I can find. However, deleting this page would lead to red links for a lot of telenovela actors, so it would be good to keep it. - Ttwaring (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - Us Twinkle users can unlink everything at the click of a button so nope there wouldn't be any red links if someone unlinks them all. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment to closer As this has been tagged for notability for 7 years, can I ask that it is relisted until we can gain consensus/sufficient number of responses? Boleyn (talk) 11:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: Final relist. Nakon 00:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  00:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, I can't find anything and Amazon isn't a reliable source, As for redlinks - If deleted I'd unlink everything so no problems there, Anyway Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, this probably qualifies as a reliable source (I did not have much time to look up sources, this was the first one which qualified).--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.