Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker Boy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Baker Boy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No Claim to notability MyTuppence (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 30.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 10:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - found a few local articles, but not enough to meet GNG for WP:CORP,  —Мандичка YO 😜 10:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: A mess. The article says the company is "Baker Boys" and goes on to talk about the people. The ostensible company fails notability guidelines as well. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Confused article, should be about the non-notable company, but instead it's mainly about their non-notable employees. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Probably could be deleted as an A7. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a leading manufacturing company of baked goods, and 1 of the top 10 employers of Western North Dakota. This is a very significant business in that region. The leaders and members of upper management are correctly ACKNOWLEDGED in this article. It should remain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.192.25.200 (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, clearly fails GNG and CORP. Not happy with the spamming campaign from the above IP either. Being locally significant (which in itself is an unproven claim) does not constitute notability on Wikipedia. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 11:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like others, all I can find is some local coverage, but nothing like the coverage in reliable sources that would be needed to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Mr Potto (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.