Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker and Linsley vs. Wildflower Inn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Baker and Linsley vs. Wildflower Inn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be a routine discrimination lawsuit - company refuses to do business with couple, couple sues business, business settles with couple. There are no indications that this case made any lasting impact on the wider community. Funny Pika! 11:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not a notable lawsuit, since it does not (and cannot) stand as precedent. Furthermore the article itself is insignificant, in that it fails to provide even the most basic information regarding the basis for the lawsuit. HillbillyGoat (talk) 04:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete—but, but, but it's about Vermont! Where I live! Awwww. It may possibly be notable as confirmation of VT equal-rights laws, but (IANAL) I'd think the fact that they settled would mean it actually isn't.  Ignatz mice•talk 06:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.