Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakhtawar Cadet College for Girls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Bakhtawar Cadet College for Girls

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Don't see how it meets WP:GNG, but happy to be proved wrong. Only potential angle seems to be it being the first-girls only college in Pakistan. If deleted, WP:SALT may be required as it's been created multiple times recently (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Bakhtawar_Cadet_College_for_Girls). Kj cheetham (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Pakistan. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - Found some sources:


 * 1) Gulf News
 * 2) Daily Jang (Urdu)
 * 3) Khabar Walay (Urdu)
 * 4) Zero Point (Urdu)
 * 5) Urdu Point (Urdu)
 * 6) Urdu Point

I think the college has some news coverage to pass WP:GNG. The first 2 of above sources give pretty deep coverage. Insight 3 (talk) 12:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be sufficient coverage for WP:GNG. Clearly notable as the first girls' cadet college in Pakistan. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Expanded and improved the above article today using the 2 existing Dawn newspaper references and also using above sources suggested by User:Insight 3. Added more categories. Significant news coverage exists for this college to pass WP:GNG. Ngrewal1 (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep (as nominator) Based on the sources found above I'm now convinced it meets WP:GNG. Clearly my own WP:BEFORE was insufficient. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.