Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakit Labis Kitang Minahal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 17:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Bakit Labis Kitang Minahal

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

OK, I'm not pinoy, nor can I read Tagalog, but I can tell when an article miserably fails WP:V and WP:RS. Much pleading to the author(s) to provide something, anything, to source this, to no avail. Apparently "Bakit Labis Kitang Minahal" is a Filipino song, and someone thinks it should be a TV show, too. Prod pulled by anon. Tubezone 05:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete unless this article can have sources. After many days trying, I cannot verify this from search engine searches, and even on ABS-CBN's own website. The author was already warned more than once to provide sources, but still nothing came up; instead, the AfD/Prod templates were deleted without adding the needed references. --- Tito Pao 12:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Additional comments. It appears that the most likely source for this would be the ABS-CBN forums; however, per WP:V, this is not an acceptable source of information. So while no official announcement has been made, I'll keep my vote as it is. It is also interesting that the current discussion on the ABSCBN forums cite this WP article instead of providing other, more reliable sources (meaning, even the forum members don't have a clue about this unverifiable future soap opera). And then again, one of the posters mentioned that this was just a rumored soap opera. Since when did rumors become the main source of information for WP articles? I would still vote for delete unless strong references can be provided. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Titopao (talk • contribs) 12:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC).


 * Delete no refs whatsoever, If the soap really exists, WP:CRYSTAL might be a better argument for deletion.Lenticel 13:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and lock unless refs are found. Can be unlocked once teasers start appearring on TV. -- Howard  the   Duck  14:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've found another article about an upcoming TV show: L.U.V. Pow. Can this be appended in the nomination too? -- Howard  the   Duck  02:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to say cojones in Tagalog, but sure, as far as I care, add any pinoy TV BS you like to this. Tubezone 10:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete The entire article is on future tense for a planned program. I seem to recall Wikipedia is not a crystall ball. User:Dimadick


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.