Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baku International Humanitarian Forum (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Baku International Humanitarian Forum
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This was deleted in a 2012 AfD for failing to meet notability requirements. It was re-created by a new account in one of their first edits in 2018. There is nothing that indicates that this is a notable forum. There is no independent reliable sourcing of this initiative by the Russian and Azerbaijani states. The only coverage is by Russian and Azerbaijani state outlets. Thenightaway (talk) 11:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Azerbaijan.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 11:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Soft deletion is not an option here so I hope for more participation. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with nom, most of the article refs fails WP:IS, the remaining refs are questionable based on NPOV. There are two routine mill news stories, #1 appears to be the only ref meeting guidelines, but the sources for the information the article is based on fail WP:IS. If I'm wrong, ping me with clearly WP:IS sources with NPOV WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  04:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: fails NORG. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.