Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balala Hakkula Sangham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closing as no consensus owing to low participation. One keep, no deletes outstanding (non-admin closure) Nightfury 10:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Balala Hakkula Sangham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inadequately-sourced article about a non-notable organization. The only available sources are press releases and passing mention - nothing close to meeting WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 12:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 12:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 12:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. There is some coverage in reputable sources.  Not in very much depth, but its rare to find in depth coverage of organisations of this sort. Rathfelder (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No in depth coverage = no article. The subject must pass WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORGIND to merit an independent article and current sources do not meet the requirements. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 02:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Context is all. There are thousands of articles about organisations without very much coverage in depth.  Depth is not an absolute term. The coverage needs to be assessed in relation to coverage of similar organisations.  What we have here is not what is described as trivial coverage - which is mostly including things in a list.  It's publications quoting the views and actions of the organisation as worth reporting. Rathfelder (talk) 07:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * We don't need to care if other stuff exists and our main focus should be on the current topic. There are hundreds of small-time organizations like this one in India, and we can't write about all of them only because they exist. A Google search for this one yield only 200 something hits and most of them are a press release, passing mentions etc. and the same goes with the current sources in the article. Can you point out one single source that talks about the organization independently? GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 08:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ——  SN  54129  13:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b<b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 04:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.