Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balderson's Cheddar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 07:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Balderson's Cheddar

 * Delete: Advertisement, non-notable commercial product. Link spam to commercial website. Lukas 10:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Doesn't pass google test, clearly an ad. Meekohi 20:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 22:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete . Balderson is a troll on discussion websites.  No possibility of encyclopedic content.  Barno 17:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * However, this AfD is about Balderson cheddar, which is quite verifiable. Your comments are essentially irrelevant to this discussion at the moment. Mind  matrix  17:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Article contained no assertion of notability nor non-commercial verifiability, and Google search of the titled spelling failed to provide evidence. However, subsequent googling for "Balderson Cheddar" gives plenty of hits, from different sources, often non-advertisement, unlike the included link.  Vote withdrawn.  Tending toward weak keep or merge into Cheddar.  Barno 19:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * First, my apologies for being so terse. I wasn't trying to get you to change your vote, only your reasoning behind it. A google search for Balderson cheese or Balderson's cheese yields a total of roughly 1150 hits, so it has some relevance, but it also appears to be another generic cheese producer. (For what it's worth, I've seen their products in several supermarkets in my area.) I thought I'd add this to clarify for any other users who particpate in this AfD. Mind  matrix  23:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have eaten Balderson's Cheddar.  But it does not need a Wikipedia article.  -- JamesTeterenko 01:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.