Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldock services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Baldock services

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. I don't see how this service station is notable. the story about ducks in the article is pure trivia. LibStar (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transport-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - If not independently notable, content could be selectively merged to A1(M) motorway. NorthAmerica1000 08:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment WP:ROADOUTCOMES says UK motorway service stations are usually kept as notable, but I have no idea of the logic behind that, because there doesn't seem to be much coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm leaning towards keep if a couple more sources can be found, particular if this is a common outcome. Philg88 ♦talk 09:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The debate on British motorway service stations has been had several times before and they are always kept as per WP:ROADOUTCOMES. These are not just truck stops. They are large complexes established and maintained by statute. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.