Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin-Jenkins Hall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Baldwin-Jenkins Hall (AfD subpage)


First version deleted as complete bollocks, second version deleted as a blatant copyvio, and now we have it back again. It's a hall of residence. And, er, that's it. Porportion of original research in this article I estimate at 100% given the cited sources (none). Even if it were sourced, we don't have articles on individual college dormitories, as a rule. WP:NFT, I think. Guy (Help!) 17:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reliable sources are provided to verify that this has notability above any other given college dorm. Demiurge 17:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Or maybe "way more notable than the average dorm", since dorms are just not very notable. --Brianyoumans 17:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. meshach 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Nashville Monkey 23:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete As the creator of the Baldwin-Jenkins page, I am still working on improving it. There are plenty of origninal context items in my article. For the non-original, I do not know where to place the citations. Examples of the creative entries are namely in the Traditions and Layout sections. There are also original entries in the second half of the History and last part of the Overview section. If you insist on deleing the BJ entry, then I see no reason to not delete the McMillan Hall entry as well. CallistoX 16:47, 3 December 2006 (PST)
 * Threats are non-conducive to debate plus see WP:POINT Nashville Monkey 00:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Edited. Also, I had to take time to sleep before I edited the original two pages, which the admins deleted quite quickly. I'm aware it was a copy, but that was only to get a feel of what I would write and edit later. 16:49, 3 December 2006 (PST)


 * Delete. Dorms are not inherently notable, and there's nothing notable about this one. WMMartin 18:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.