Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaleDoneen Method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  Sandstein  15:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

BaleDoneen Method

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

essentially an advertisement. The method is already covered in the article on Amy Doneen, and the description of it here is exactly what would be found in an advertisement for patients. The essence of this method seems to be testing patients regardless of risk, a currently not recommended practice.(The actual test and therapies used are perfectly standard)Studies showing possible value of of this approach are included, but not those that say otherwise.  DGG ( talk ) 06:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:19, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:19, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment This certainly reads very much like an advertisement, especially as practically all material presented is unabashedly laudatory. However, I am not sufficiently acquainted with the various WP:MEDRS conventions to decide wehther this is undue promotion or just thorough representation of a positive uptake. Seems somewhat excessively detailed, in any case. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.