Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balfour Senior Living


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Balfour Senior Living

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article on non=-notable community. I and another eds. removed most of the spam, but there isn't enough left to support the article. Almost every ref is a local press release--based article published in local newspapers; almost every award is also local.

Created by an spa, who would seem to be an undeclared paid editor, judging by the content of the original version.  I thought and still think it should have been deleted rather than waste the effort trying to improve as volunteers what others are being paid for and doing incompetently.  DGG ( talk ) 15:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep Btw, I tore out a bunch of the pretty useless content out of it as well. I don't disagree much of the coverage is local, but The Denver Post isn't nothing. Surprisingly quite a bit of media over the fact they are doing pot classes, which at the moment seems to be their claim to fame. I also agree the awards carry little merit with me. That said, I think it's references (and there's a few more online) nudge it over the notability edge, although I won't shed any tears if consensus feels otherwise. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  04:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references provided meet the criteria for establishing notability and I cannot find any that do. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. References are not intellectually independent and rely on company-produced information, the Denver Post article mentioned above included since it relies almost exclusively on an interview, therefore fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing ++ 17:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a run-of-the-mill establishment; sourcing does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Basically, promotion for a nn business. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.