Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bali Paradise or Corrupt Indonesian Hell?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Bali Paradise or Corrupt Indonesian Hell?
Hopelessly POV essay. -- RHaworth 18:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NPOV violation. Essay, unwikified, etc.   (aeropagitica)   18:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOT a publisher of original thought -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 19:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete per WP:NOT. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 20:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and a breach of NPOV. Capitalistroadster 02:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Capitalistroadster. Dr Debug (Talk) 04:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge, rename, and revise. If Bali is somewhere that has a lot of corruption whatever that may mean it can be merged with Bali. I know the current content is POV, but if that is a deletion criterion then let's set the precendent.  There appear to be sources but not tied to any specific text, but is that reason enough to delete it. Or is the consensus going to be that we just don't like it enough and no one cares to fix it so it's easier to just delete it?  In any event the name has got to be changed. Carlossuarez46 22:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.