Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ballahick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge all into Isle of Man Railway Level Crossings and Points of Interest (which should be moved to conform to the naming conventions, but that's not part of this AFD). - Krakatoa  Katie  10:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Ballahick

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Is that a train in the distance? Unremarkable level crossings and other railway features. None of these have asserted any notoriety of any sort (e.g. a serious accident) and a quick search for sources found precisely nothing. I don't see why we should care. MER-C 09:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe, merge with Isle of Man Railway Level Crossings and Points of Interest then delete, but none seem worthy of their own articles. Or just delete. Emeraude 14:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence or assertion of notability for these railway crossings. They can't be any more notable than the Progressive Rail crossings at Old Shakopee Road, Lyndale Avenue, West 90th Street, West 86th Street, American Boulevard, or any other crossings in Bloomington, Minnesota.  (Those streets aren't notable either, but that's beside the point.) --Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Isle of Man Railway Level Crossings and Points of Interest (and that article needs to be moved to bring it in line with established naming conventions). Level crossings by themselves are not inherently notable enough to warrant separate articles for each one; if one has a historical designation, such as being a listed building or somesuch, then we can reconsider that one, but I don't see that here.  Slambo (Speak)  18:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge; I agree with Slambo. --Tkynerd 21:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - I agree with Slambo's suggestion. Should there be anything found about these seemingly ordinary crossings that demonstrates any special uniqueness, an article can be created then. --Oakshade 21:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. Everybody loves the sound of a train in the distance. Grutness...wha?  02:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Slambo. I concur also with the proposed renaming of the points of interest article, though that's a request for another day. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.