Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ballies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. Alexf(talk) 21:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Ballies

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

obvious WP:MADEUP WP:BOLLOCKS. Ironholds (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - The kindest thing you can say about the article is that it might almost be considered a neologism but even that is against Wikipedia policy. --  At am a chat 19:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  — At am a chat 19:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. We need a speedy delete category for obviously non-notable neologisms, these things sit around for too long. Hairhorn (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Cunard (talk) 19:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Perhaps a category WP:UTTERRUBBISH would make sense?Tyrenon (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We've got WP:COMPLETEBOLLOCKS, but it isn't a speedy cat. Ironholds (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Par my earlier prod: WP:NEO and Not For Things. Though the article linked above me is tempting me to use it instead.... Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Full blown WP:NEO.  Predicting WP:SNOW from up here in Seattle, guys. =) -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 21:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.