Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BallisticNG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  06:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

BallisticNG

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet general notability. No sources are offered to indicate how this free game is notable. My search could only find places to obtain the game. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Non-notable fan game per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 01:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: invalid argument: "Fan game" has nothing to do with notability (or missing of). there is some reception: https://archive.org/stream/Maximum_PC_November_2016#page/n53/mode/2up/search/%22BallisticNG%22+ https://www.kotaku.com.au/2016/05/someone-wants-to-make-another-wipeout-but-weve-got-enough-already/ also: at least 100,000 players http://steamspy.com/app/473770 Shaddim (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It being a fan game isn't my reason for deletion, but rather that it is a non-notable fan game which I did say. SL93 (talk) 02:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * mentioning of "fan game" would than being superfluous, "game" would have been engouh. Doing some more research seems to indicate that this game is highly popular. I'm starting to tend to go "weak keep". Shaddim (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  09:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Coverage is weak but not passing mentions. --Izno (talk) 11:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Of all the mentions in a video game reliable sources custom Google search, there isn't enough substance to do justice to the topic (reviews, dev history, gameplay details). There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. Eye close font awesome.svg czar  08:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.