Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ballistic advantage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not a huge amount of discussion, but enough to call this a consensus to delete. Some sources were mentioned, but they appear to all be passing mentions, announcements, or otherwise not establishing notability. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Ballistic advantage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Doesn't appear to pass WP:CORP. Article was speedy deleted once and declined 3 times at AfC. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: reviews found here, here, here, and here. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  21:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Defense Review is questionable as a source. Regardless, the first is a product review, not coverage of the company. The second is an announcement about their current product line, not coverage of the company. And the third is about a gun made up of parts, including a part from this company, not coverage of this company. Being mentioned doesn't make you notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:CORP. I found a few mentions of some of their products, but no actual coverage of the company. MB (talk) 05:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC) Delete...Ballistic Advantage is a parts maker. As I see it, we all know GM, Ford and Chrysler, but how many people can name the companies that supply them with parts?--RAF910 (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.