Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltimore Kings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Baltimore Kings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Independent team that has yet to actually play a "fully pro" match, the first of which won't actually be against a pro-league team. Grand total of 6 GNews hits, all either from the Baltimore region (surprise surprise) or brief one-line mentions. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, and would simply appear to be TOOSOON for the team. Primefac (talk) 20:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - lack of notability should be enough for this one. Skycycle (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NFOOTY, has not played in a national competition. No sign yet of wider GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 20:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.