Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balwyn High


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Ral315 (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Balwyn High School
Substantially no information. Conscious 15:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is not even enough information to identify what/where it is.  It might very well be notable, assuming all schools are notable, but not currently. Mmmbeer 15:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, valid stub, and per Schools/Arguments. Incidentally this school seems to attract a lot of people to live in Balwyn . Kappa 15:49, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa. -- DS1953 16:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as high school in Victoria. Reasonable little school stub. Capitalistroadster 18:19, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Another nn school. Dottore So 19:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn school stub --JAranda &#124; watz sup 20:03, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Schools/Arguments. Notable to the community which it serves.  Silensor 20:50, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep an important school, as schools tend to be. --rob 20:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Please do not nominate any more schools as it achieves nothing but the generation of ill-will between users. CalJW 21:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article fails to establish notability. --Carnildo 23:08, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article fails to establish notability.--Nicodemus75 05:55, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Schools/ArgumentsJoaquin Murietta 00:23, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. Another fine start to a good school article.   Un  focused  00:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep schools. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:59, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, stub with no potental to be expanded. --Aquillion 07:33, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has been expanded significantly, so my nomination applies no more. Thank you Kappa. Conscious 12:53, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep At first it basically had no info, but now it's expanded. Alensha 13:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: Also as per Schools/Arguments -newkai | talk | contribs 16:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Schools/Arguments Denni &#9775; 00:40, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neutralitytalk 02:00, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * keep and please do not confuse popularity with notability Yuckfoo 17:30, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep See my argument at this page. Xoloz 03:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.