Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bama bangs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 12:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Bama bangs

 * — (View AfD)

Probable nn haircut. Prod removed, references added of debatable RS status. Neutral listing. Hornplease 06:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn haircut, only 136 non-wiki ghits. MER-C 07:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn haircut; just a bowl cut for guys who won't take off their baseball hats.  SkierRMH, 08:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * comment: What do you guys think the most appropriate definition of notability for a haircut is, lacking a N:fashion list or anything? I'm inclined to say that when it's a cultural phenomenon that's been reported on by a third party (IE a croydon facelift) then it's notable, or if it's associated in an important/visible way with a notable subculture (IE the "Flock of Seagulls" haircut that typified 80s new-wave bands). Wintermut3 08:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I want to say Delete as non-notable/non-encyclopedic. But then what do we do with tellum, reverse mullet, and who-knows-how-many-other stubby articles describing bad ill-advised idiosyncratic hairstyles? - Eron Talk 14:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only significant coverage of this hairstyle comes from Clay Travis, and that's not enough to establish notability. Nick Graves 16:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism. —ShadowHalo 04:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.