Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bambi Northwood-Blyth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Bambi Northwood-Blyth

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I can't see significant coverage and that should not just passing mentions about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. And Press Releases/Paid releases are not allowed such as PRNewswire. Fails WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 18:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep This model has been on the covers of prestigious magazines such as Vogue Japan, Elle Australia etc and is a well known face. I do not agree with the suggestion to delete. Google her name and see the number of articles about her to prove her note-worthy existence and body of work. She is a model of notability and was a host of Channel V which is broadcast around Australia. Cites provided are from credible publications that include interviews with her - something these publications wouldn't seek or publish as a feature if she wasn't noteable. These reputable sources include W Magazine, Grazia Magazine, Wonderland, Marie Claire, Sydney Morning Herald etc.Grapepinky (talk) 13:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non notable model. Fails WP:GNG.JeepersClub (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - there's a huge volume of vapid nonsense out there covering everything from her personal relationships to individual (yes, individual) outfits on any given day. It's questionable whether the totality of that volume meets our significant coverage requirements. But we also have articles like this, this, and this (and various things of similar quality). Some of that is equally vapid but it rises (as far as I'm concerned) to the level of significant coverage, and those are certainly reliable sources. So that's enough for me.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 07:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Stalwart111. Lots of reliable RS. Passes GNG.4meter4 (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.