Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bambino cat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Munchkin or another section thereof Star   Mississippi  03:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Bambino cat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:Notability (breeds) requires recognition from a major registry which the Bambino currently lacks (it's only experimental). There are many Munchkin derived breeds and I do not believe that they meet notability without the recognition as there's nothing special about them, other issues in the article include poor sources such as generic pet care websites and many of the references are about the Munchkin itself (as health issues and legal issues relate to the breed) To add on to notability issues the breed doesn't even seem to be mentioned on TICA's website. Have mentioned deletion on Wikiproject Cats too. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Improve and expand as needed. Do not delete. It appears to be an interesting, referenced article. The purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to remove it from view. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: The above user is an AFD spammer with non-policy based arguments. Geschichte (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * “Spammer” is an insult that should probably be avoided. My comment stands. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 00:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comments that do not touch upon policy at all, but instead are in breach of WP:INTERESTING, WP:ITSUSEFUL and WP:NOTEVERYTHING, may "stand" but they don't carry much weight when the discussion is closed. You seem to misunderstand or to not have read many policies. Geschichte (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect to Munchkin and include a short section about derivatives there. Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've added the mention of the couple being warned to stop breeding it in Munchkin and have added details about the derivatives to the article as well. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * To expand on my above !vote, this article suffers from sourcing issues, and WikiProject Cats strongly recommends only having articles for cat breeds fully acknowledged by a major cat registry. Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect per SilverTiger12 PianoDan (talk) 22:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.