Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete per Notability (academic journals). -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete another WP:NOTABILITY violation. December21st2012Freak  Lord of the Vulcans 04:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 06:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 07:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was considering nominating this one for deletion myself; I looked it up in Google scholar and found very few citations for any of its papers, so it does not pass Notability (academic journals) criterion 2. There's also no evidence that it passes either of the other two criteria (third-party sources about the journal or some significant history). And given the contribution patterns of its creator and of  and  it may be appropriate to consider WP:SSP. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per David Eppstein. In addtion, journal apparently not ranked in any major indexing service. I did see, though, that it is indexed in Scopus (and under consideration for ISI). --Crusio (talk) 11:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this journal. Joe Chill (talk) 22:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've checked the indexing of this journal. It is not indexed by Web of Science and Scirus; it is indexed by Scopus. I'm not sure how this qualifies for criterium 1 of Notability (academic journals) and urge the voters and closing admin to consider that. We don't know whether or not the journal will be accepted by ISI (it would automatically qualify if listed there). I myself welcome open-access journals (that is free access to articles) as they go along with the WP spirit. Materialscientist (talk) 23:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.