Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banco Votorantim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Banco Votorantim

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

*Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep It would be best if someone who speaks Spanish could look into non-English sources for this article, however, Banco Votorantim is covered on several international news sites here and here for example. NewAccount4Me (talk) 20:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:, , , , , , , . Northamerica1000(talk) 02:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment** - The references above seem to be about a company buying out the subject of this article, not about the subject itself. Caffeyw (talk) 05:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin DavidEllis simply votes the same at mulitple AfDs . eg, , , , , . LibStar (talk) 01:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the studious efforts of Northamerica1000 in identifying all those sources listed above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.