Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Band BeCa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Wug·a·po·des​ 23:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Band BeCa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG or the criteria from WP:NMUSIC. Four sources in the article (one is repeated) are promos, announcements, and an interview. Before showed nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Some routine mill coverage exists and mentions in other articles that fall under WP:NOTINHERITED. BLP related articles should strictly follow WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements. WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy ::  talk  02:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  02:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  02:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. It looks like they are getting some gigs and may achieve notability later. But for now they only have friendly softball intro interviews and reprinted press releases written by management. This is common for African musical acts and creates the illusion of reliable media coverage. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 17:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — I agree with both &  I believe the band falls to satisfy WP:BAND. Celestina007 (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.