Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandbaja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  Hut 8.5  21:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Bandbaja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Not notable as a website.  Greenbörg  (talk)  12:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: No sustained coverage found, however it did once have some level of notability -- from The Herald Vol37 ?1-3? Page 262 "Back in December 2004, Bandbaja.org, an online music review website, generated a great deal of ink for providing musicians easy access to a popular forum for their music and videos. The website was adored and publicised in numerous print articles before vanishing...". It's not really a keep with what's visible, but a redirect and mention/capsule-listing somewhere (but where...?) might be reasonable. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 05:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- meh, a pretty transient web site; does not meet WP:NWEB. No suitable merge/redirect target and no SIGCOV, so delete. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Seems to fail on notability. Shaded0 (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.