Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandhagen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 23:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Bandhagen

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is non-notable and provides little or no content.  ~  Mag nus   ani mum    (aka Steptrip) 00:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Actual district in a major city. Inherently notable. Swedish Wikipedia has a more extensive article on this topic. --Oakshade 00:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Why on earth would we delete this? It a district of a major city. Totally notable and better to have very little on it than nothing (and the interwiki link to sv.wiki is useful). I recommend list this at Translation so it can be expanded. WjBscribe 00:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletions.   -- WjBscribe 00:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's a significant city. Wish someone would expand it from its perpetual stub status, though... --  Valley   2   city   ₪‽ 05:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep should never have been nominated, town on the outskirts of a major city, and would also qualify by virtue of its station. Needs expanding, not deleting —  irides centi   (talk to me!)  16:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable place.SlideAndSlip 14:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.