Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandwagon music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Bandwagon music

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is about a record label with no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Article as been speedy deleted 4 times under the title Bandwagon Music. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi,

Once again my entry for Bandwagon Music is to be deleted.

I am beginning to think there is some kind of conspiracy against Bandwagon Music!

Here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_record_labels you have hundreds of music labels the majority of which have nothing notable about them.

To pick a couple randomly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_Apostles_%28record_label%29 or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_Beads_of_Sweat or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aardvark_Records

Why are they not being deleted? There is many many more like this.

Bandwagon Music is THE ONLY MUSIC PUBLISHING CO-OPERATIVE on the planet

Surely that is a more notable quality than most?

Thank you

Jules --Juleseleven11 (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juleseleven11 (talk • contribs) 11:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC) ps. I understand if you delete this page but surely that rule should apply to many many other entries here on wikipedia. I know I have come across plenty. J --Juleseleven11 (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juleseleven11 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Also, Juleseleven11, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a good argument. If you think those articles should be deleted, then nominate them for deletion as well. -- doorautomatica   (talk)  06:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Jules does this article no favours by making such claims as "Bandwagon Music is THE ONLY MUSIC PUBLISHING CO-OPERATIVE on the planet". Are we really supposed to believe this? Has (s)he really done the research to check that no other such cooperative exists anywhere on the planet? It's impossible to have a sensible discussion about whether this article should be kept when people make such ridiculous statements. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Dear Phil, First of all I don't believe we can have a sensible discussion about this as you seem to have already made your mind up. For the record I have spent ten years of my life researching this subject so yes I do feel justified in making this claim. How long have you spent? I challenge you to find another. I am sorry that you find it ridiculous. Perhaps the wording could have been less overstated.This labour of love will be the death of me!! I shall return with this entry in the not to distant future ;) Love and Light, Jules--Juleseleven11 (talk) 09:52, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I just spent a few seconds researching this subject and found the Nota Bene Music Publishing Cooperative in Christchurch, New Zealand, which, the last time I checked, was on the same planet as St. Albans. I have not made my mind up, but it will be easier for me to do so if you refrain from making untrue, incredible and self-aggrandising marketing statements, the type of which I would expect from grasping capitalists rather than an ethical green cooperativePhil Bridger (talk) 10:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Touché. Not sure I can recover from that one.You make a fair point. I dont work too well in this grasping capitalistic society, because of this I at times over aggrandise my position to compensate. I apologise. Leave it in or take it out. Que sera sera. Jules--Juleseleven11 (talk) 22:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juleseleven11 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.