Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandy Kiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Bandy Kiki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable blogger. The claim of "first Cameroonian to come out as lesbian" is both unsourced and unlikely. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 18:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

The aspect of been the first Cameroonian lesbian has been cleanupAbanda bride  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The keep votes are poor. What sources are we relying on?
 * Keep. Seems pretty notable from what I can turn up - however, needs a serious cleanup for referencing and general BLP issues, as it seems she is a bit of a controversial figure. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up as it demonstrates notability, but the controversial claim that she is the first out lesbian from Cameroon is... unsourced at the very least. --Theredproject (talk) 22:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete sources do not rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep She has been profiled by BBC for her work and activism, and has received enough significant coverage in secondary, independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG ("If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list"). Lonehexagon (talk) 04:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 05:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete.  Weak delete   WP:BEFORE sources return no RS results with exact text match for full subject name. I don't know how RS appear in the article, maybe I'm copy pasting wrong, but I didn't find anything.   Reliable Sources Search Engine returns zero hits. I'm not sure that the newly listed sources are reliable and independent.  w umbolo   ^^^  13:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 19:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  13:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Hate to relist a third time but the first relist had a pointed comment that was not addressed. What are the reliable sources that are the basis of the keep votes?
 * Keep per Theredproject and others. While it seems the article needs better referencing, the subject seems to merit a Wiki article. ExRat (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Covered by BBC World Service, and extensively in Cameroonian media. The BBC coverage seems to lift her to more than regional interest. Mattyjohn (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment RS include: BBC, Cameroon Daily Journal, Cameroon News Agency, Cameroon Journal, The Rustin Times, and Artefact Magazine (published by BA Journalism students at the London College of Communication, which I think it an indication that the article was properly researched and edited)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.