Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bang-Jazz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Bang-Jazz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible neologism. No references, no relevant Google hits. And how can it already have been developed in the mid 21st century? Mostly likely made up. Author declined PROD with no substantial changes or comments. Singularity42 (talk) 01:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 02:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Don't know if it's a hoax, but if John Cage created it, it still falls under the WP:NFT rules.  Needs more notability (and better writing, frankly) if it's going to be here.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Google news and books search doesn't turn up anything that would be called "bang-jazz". No prejudice to this article being recreated in the mid-21st century. Mandsford (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.