Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bang (progenitor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Bang (progenitor)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage in reliable sources.

Source analysis:


 * A couple of premodern chronicles (Firishta, Salim).


 * There is a source from 1946, which does not mention our subject. The same observations apply to the 1992 "encyclopedia" and Thaker (1970). A news-site, of unknown reliability, documenting the dilapidated condition of a tomb has been cited but it neither supports the preceding line nor has anything on our subject. Another news article, documenting a grave and attached legends, is cited but has nothing on our subject.


 * All these sources have been used to engage in original research about possible connections between Bang and Vanga or go to tangent explorations, to inflate the article.


 * Trautmann has the trivialest of mention. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology, Bangladesh,  and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm. -- Mehedi Abedin 16:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete lot of WP:OR - e.g. Bang being equivalent to the Hindu Vanga. Most references do not include reference to Bang. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 07:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.