Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bang On Brewery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Bang On Brewery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another Article has any source whatsoever and therefore is ineligible for A7. I have half a mind to write up an RfC on this just to watch it fail.

Handful of puff local pieces and one passing mention in The Guardian. Patently non-notable local pub/brewery, despite their "unique and passionately created" ales, which apparently passes as a claim of significance. Timothy Joseph Wood 14:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Page reads like a puff piece and the brewery is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 14:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - totally promotional because it's little more than a Yellow Pages entry and that's what business directories are for, and because its full of promotional peacock terms.  Should obviously have been tagged  A7 and G11 - who's doing New Page Patrol these days? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Kudpung กุดผึ้ง - It was tagged. Related discussion is at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Anyone welcome to join in, whether you agree or not. Timothy Joseph Wood  15:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep – I've added a few more references to the article. Some are better than others, but taken together they're enough to show that the brewery meets the general notability guideline, in my opinion.  (The passing mention in The Guardian, mentioned in passing above, still has not been added to the article, but it could be.)  For extra credit I've also toned down the promotional language.   I would request that your re-assess based on these changes.  Thanks.  — Mudwater (Talk) 22:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I trimmed the lead even more but I maintain my vote to delete because most of the references included in the page are just local coverage. Meatsgains (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unfortunately, removing the promotionalism has also removed all   content except directory information and  a product list. No reason to think they;'re notable  DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.