Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangdb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Bangdb

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I can't find any evidence that this article passes our inclusion guidelines Ironholds (talk) 02:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: no indications of notability. When I was searching for subject's coverage I came across a gigaom article with a comment by Gigaom user "cloud-dev": "Please check out Bangdb (http://www.iqlect.com) the new key value store which seems to be very fast in terms of IOPS for both read and write. The Bangdb will be in many flavors for ex; embedded, network, elastic cache/imdg. Being crash proof, with many configuration parameters, it can be tuned to operate in most suitable fashion for a given requirement." Note, the bangdb article is written by Wikipedia editor cloud-dev. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * delete This is a new product, with every sign of being a COI promotional article on a topic of no evident notability. 3rd party sourcing is crucial to demonstrate its significance. If there isn't any, then delete. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - unreferenced, no indication of notability, created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 11:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.