Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangkok City F.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The additional time I gave for this discussion has only resulted in indication that the sources claimed to show GNG are actually merely routine. Fenix down (talk) 13:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Bangkok City F.C.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No claim or evidence of notability, nor of meeting the standards of WP:FOOTYN.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep: Bangkok City F.C. has appeared in Khaosod newspaper, Manager newspapers and Matichon newspapers Media of Thailand. It is national public news. Amateur teams of Amateur league, which there is team history, have team wiki articles. Amateur teams of Amateur league don't team history in public news. they haven't wiki articles. You may not all teams in Amateur league haven't any articles Aquaelfin (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - it's as confused as Aquaelfin's other amateur team articles - a professional team in an amateur league? A press conference announcing that there will be a team is not WP:SIGCOV, nor is it a "History". Cabayi (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Why Pualand F.C. articles pass ? This teams don't appeared in national public news but join in 2018 Thai FA Cup. This teams has wiki articles !!!!!!! It doesn't make sent and fail Ameteur club standard which can or cannot wiki articles. Thailand Amateur League started after Thai FA Cup. I don't know each team which join or don't join Thailand Amateur League. I think to changes WP:FOOTYN defination teams which has wiki articles to must play in national level of the league structure. It prevents to create teams don't join Thailand Amateur League and more. Teams in Thailand Amateur League which have wiki articles must appeared team history in National public news. Aquaelfin (talk) 18:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - It doesn't true if you fix national cups to determine Amateur teams which have wiki articles. You see teams which isn't Amateur teams in national leagues but this teams have wiki articles ? Why do you fix Amateur teams in national leagues to determine Amateur teams which have wiki articles ? For Amateur teams in national leagues which have wiki articles standard. I introduce see history teams of Amateur teams in national leagues to get standard. If you choose any way to Amateur teams in national leagues which have wiki articles standard, I don't problem. I would like to fix Amateur teams in national leagues to base for determine Amateur teams which have wiki articles.


 * such as *England: Clubs that play or have played at step 6 (level 10), or in the FA Cup, FA Trophy, FA Amateur Cup or FA Vase generally meet WP:GNG criteria. I accept this example.


 * for *Thailand: Clubs that don't play or haven't played T1 to T5 generally meet WP:GNG criteria. Aquaelfin (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: None of the keep votes here actually, provide evidence of notability, but there is no strong consensus. More time should be given to expand on comments, namely why is the coverage significant.
 * Keep - Don`t see any reason to delete articles as long as the info added is correct. SveinFalk (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: The online coverage in Khaosod, Manager and Matichon Online seems quite significant for its level. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:54, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment The Club have history of clubs national scoop and catching up with the national news feed. Do Fenix down know Thailand national news ? Aquaelfin (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2019(UTC)
 * , is your English really so bad that you don't understand when someone's given you another week to make your case? Cabayi (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Cabayi I think you don't understand my interpretive meaning. I explain Paul_012 significant for this article. I think his use same defination but you think its doesn't true.


 * For you, A lot of news are draw or results of Thai FA Cup only. don't have clubs webpage. don't have history of clubs. don't have any national news report clubs to scoop. while some T5-club only has played in T5 but have clubs webpage, history of clubs scoop, catching up with the national news feed. Do you think what team have wiki article ?


 * For Wiki football moderator such as Cabayi, Many Wiki football moderator have good english language but don't have football league knowledge Aquaelfin (talk) 4:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment translating the sources show there's at least some claim of notability here. Two of them discuss a partnership with South Korea and the other discusses a youth tournament the club puts on. I just don't know if they're enough to pass WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  talk  04:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability and WP:NFOOTBALL. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment  - could you be more specific? NFOOTY refers exclusively to players not clubs so I am not sure what you are saying here. Fenix down (talk) 23:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: Hmm. Looking again at the sources, they all seem to be covering the press event announcing the club's establishment. Could probably be considered WP:ROUTINE. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - one of numerous non-notable amateur teams for which this editor has attempted to create articles. Deb (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.