Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangkok International Dental Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Bangkok International Dental Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable company/building/clinic. Fails both WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. I looked up the included reference from the Charlotte Observer and the depth of coverage about the dental practice is minimal in my opinion. Searches for additional references find no substantial coverage of the subject. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is clearly a major medical facility in Bangkok on a par with a hospital. It obviously needs work and additional independent sourcing, but that's not a justification for deletion. George Ponderevo (talk) 00:35, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete since there are zero independent refs, nothing that is claimed can be confirmed and the subject completely fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | squeal _ 15:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep This indeed seems to be a major facility, and while more references could improve it, English-language ones may be hard to come by. --BDD (talk) 16:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If this were a major service-centre working entirely in the Thai language, I'd expect a article in the Thai language wikipedia. There's a textual mention on what appears to be an artists' article, but that paragraph has no references we can steal. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found a few cites at Google books, news, and scholar, but far too few to show notability. None discuss this centre in detail. Bearian (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * How many would be needed to show notability in your opinion? George Ponderevo (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Received the Prime Minister’s Export Award for Best Service Provider in 2010. Couldn't find any other coverage. --101.109.221.68 (talk) 07:07, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Corporate awards do not generally infer notability and the depth of coverage of this award article is minimal. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * @George Ponderevo: we need "multiple reliable sources" - probably three or four are enough. Bearian (talk) 17:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.